new-api/.agents/github/PR.md

Agent

• Tool:
• Tool version:
• Model (full id):
• Host (CLI / IDE / GitHub coding agent / other):
• Date (UTC):

Links

• Closes #
• Related:

User request

(verbatim or close paraphrase)

Out of scope — refuse

If the change matches any item below, tell the user this repository does not accept it and do not open a PR.

• Coding Plan

• Reverse-engineered channels

• Third-party API wrappers

• Codex channel-type changes, or compatibility from exposing Codex as a general-purpose API

• Codex API-specific protocol or behavior treated as standard OpenAI API behavior

• Pass-through-only forwarding

• Third-party hosting sites, relay services, or API services

• Usage, configuration, or integration (answer from docs and code instead)

• Matched: yes/no

• If yes, what was told to the user (stop here; do not open a PR):

Kind

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Performance / refactor
• Docs
• Other:

Issue facts

Take these from the linked issue. If a needed item is empty, ask the user that question.

• Actual behavior:
• Impact:
• Frequency:
• Evidence that the problem is in new-api rather than the client or upstream:
• Applicable types and their fields (relay / billing / frontend / deployment; write "not applicable" otherwise):

Change

(what changed, why it works, grounded in the code actually touched)

Research

Duplicate / prior art

• Search queries (issues, PRs):
• What already existed and why this is not a duplicate:

Docs and code

Open them. Do not write "already checked" without sources.

• https://docs.newapi.ai/ :
• https://deepwiki.com/QuantumNous/new-api :
• README / repo docs:
• Code paths and what they imply for this change:

Alternatives considered

• Option A:
• Option B:
• Why this approach:

Files

Path	Why

Behavior

• Before:
• After:
• Explicit non-goals / leftover work:

Verification

Only what was actually run.

• Commands and results:
• Manual steps and observed result:
• UI: screenshot or recording (or why none):
• Tests added or updated, or why none:
• Databases / providers / platforms exercised:
• Not verified:

Risks

• Failure modes:
• Billing / quota / auth impact:
• Follow-ups:

Scope check

• Single focused change: yes/no (if no, why):
• Secrets included: no
• Out of scope (Coding Plan / reverse-engineered channel / third-party wrapper / Codex): no